← Search

Michael Chaffman

Rock Hill, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 59W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michael Chaffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Timothy Pavkov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Robert Marlowe / Frantz Etienne
2026-08-27 · MCTA40/Kanase/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Durga Deepak Guntuboyina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rohit Soman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Micah Lucky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Micah Lucky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rohit Soman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Hoover mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
Jonathan Hurd / Mike Anthony
2026-07-16 · MCTA40/Kanase/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with PATRICK TIGHE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · MCTA 3.5M 18 & Over (Pavkov) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi O'Brien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Sison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Badr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 53.9% of games
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 46.3% of games
6.5
40%
8W–12L · 50.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 69% of games
3.5mixed
79.2%
19W–5L · 59.1% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams