← Search

Zhen Zu

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 49W–44L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Zhen Zu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CJacobs/ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · CJacobs/ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · CJacobs/ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Kennard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Badr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-18 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-06 · ZGilbert (Veterans Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · ZGilbert (Veterans Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerardo Estrada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 52.1% of games
4.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.2% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.9% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 48% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer