← Search

Amanda Cheek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waxhaw, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 120W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history232 matches
W
2026-09-11 · ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bissett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-10 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Rupnarine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-07 · ACheek/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Hoffman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-04 · ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bissett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-03 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with SJ Pragasam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · LRosser/MHabegger (Weddington Chase) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Sharp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bissett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Kirschner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Kirschner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · ACheek/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · LRosser/MHabegger (Weddington Chase) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Doris Rahman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
3.0
52.2%
24W–22L · 53.1% of games
3.5
38.5%
25W–40L · 49% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.8% of games
5.5
81%
17W–4L · 64.3% of games
6.5
69.8%
37W–16L · 55.9% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 48% of games
3.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43.9% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams