← Search

Jennifer Lundberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BELMONT, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
393 matches · 199W–194L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history393 matches
W
2026-10-31 · MCTA50/Usina/RHTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · MCTA50/Usina/RHTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-07 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marie McDaniel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-05 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Faile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-10-02 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Unterberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marie McDaniel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · MCTA50/Usina/RHTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-28 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecile Yager
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Musante championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-25 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Unterberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Cass
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-14 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Carnahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 50.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
49.4%
87W–89L · 50.7% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.7%
79W–45L · 56% of games
8.5
33.3%
14W–28L · 41.7% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
83 matches
#1 Singles
8%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert