← Search

Kristen Unterberg

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 39W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristen Unterberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-02 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Burkhamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lara Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lara Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Beaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Don Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Unterberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Unterberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Unterberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Unterberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Verma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · MCTA40/Ruggerio/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Unterberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.3% of games
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.6% of games
3.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61.2% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer