← Search

Kimberly Burkhamer

FORT MILL, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 135W–94L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Burkhamer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NHaskins (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Daugherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Unterberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-27 · NHaskins (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Daugherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Gluff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · PDonoghue (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Castain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · JGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Rawdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · MCTA55/Claxton/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ofelia Claxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · JGluff (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
6W–6L · 53% of games
4.0
59.8%
67W–45L · 54.5% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
60.8%
59W–38L · 53% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova