Mary Eshleman
Matthews, NC
120 matches · 79W–41L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Mary Eshleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history120 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Jennifer Johnson / Kathryn Klaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.2% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.9% of games
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 67% of games
4.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.9% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 37.1% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.1% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.