← Search

Maebeth Hill

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
100 matches · 47W–53L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.5
132 of 176
NC · 3.5
218 of 293
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Maebeth is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maebeth has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Maebeth has gone from the 18th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 53.5% of games
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 36.8% of games
7.5
60%
18W–12L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Lacarter
−0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Schachte
−0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Spera
−0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Cheri King / Kathleen Griffith
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucia Royal
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
W
Shirley Stoltenberg / Janet Baker
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Richards
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
Nicole Morris / Shirley Stoltenberg
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Dunn
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Janet Baker / Debbie Carmazzi
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Shackelford
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Saundra Denny / Shirley Stoltenberg
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leila Tissue
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 7-6
L
Shirley Stoltenberg / Saundra Denny
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Dunn
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
W
Lisa Riggins / Nicole Morris
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Richards
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Debbie Carmazzi / Saundra Denny
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Dunn
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Marla Figard / Rosemary Hill
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Roxburgh
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.