← Search

Ashley Emison

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 100W–48L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ashley Emison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-08-31 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Eshleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annaliese Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · MEshleman (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Jourdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Michelle Crawford / HEATHER PHELPS
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Annaliese Anderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Zimmer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Eshleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jourdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · ASelf (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jourdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 66.4% of games
4.0
80%
32W–8L · 58% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.2% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#1 Singles
32%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert