← Search

Kristy Brannock

Monroe, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 196W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kristy Brannock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history266 matches
W
2026-09-07 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobbie McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Klug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · BMarthinsen (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-24 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Ranadive
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Keen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Dana Zimmer / Ashley Emison
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Janet Garvey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · BMarthinsen (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristin Kapur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Klug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Applegate championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Austin Taylor / Emily Weigel
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Kapur championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 69.9% of games
4.0
79.3%
73W–19L · 62.2% of games
6.5
100%
9W–0L · 72.2% of games
7.5
71.2%
42W–17L · 58.2% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.5% of games
4.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#1 Singles
16%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
27 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer