← Search

Victoria Ellington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHARLOTTE, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 166W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history228 matches
L
2026-10-05 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Pardi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-28 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Strump
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-14 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Strump
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Pardi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Pardi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-17 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Ruggiero
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Pardi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Bowers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · Welborn/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Allard championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · Welborn/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gracie Gentry championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-09 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Silvy Kehrli
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maja Dogic
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 81.2% of games
2.75
88.9%
8W–1L · 73.9% of games
3.0
75%
24W–8L · 63.5% of games
3.25
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.5
87.9%
58W–8L · 64.5% of games
3.75
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 49% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 38% of games
5.5
100%
9W–0L · 76.6% of games
6.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.1% of games
7.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
40 matches
#1 Singles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer