← Search

Lisa Strump

Fort Mill, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 34W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Strump to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-09-09 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Nataliya Rubanenko championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Moncayo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Moncayo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dominique Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-30 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-23 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Monty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-09-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dawn Houpt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 61.7% of games
3.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 43.8% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 53% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King