← Search

Jane Moncayo

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
111 matches · 46W–65L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
9%
stay 3.0
91%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 52% stay · 48% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.11 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.0
61 of 115
NC · 3.0
89 of 189
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Jane is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jane has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jane has gone from the 21st to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
43.9%
18W–23L · 49.3% of games
3.5
30.4%
7W–16L · 41% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games
6.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
L
Kylie Holt / Tricia Magee
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Strump
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dominique Greene
−0.036below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Katie Eggers / Ciara McKiernan
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Strump
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Peggy Reimann / Kathy Lucas
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Houpt
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
W
Adrienne Smith / Corinne McBrier
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dominique Greene
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Andrea Caldini / Adriana Hall
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melodie Ohaus
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Davies
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
Linda Hunley / Megan Francis
2026-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ruggiero
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Stacy Andrews / Tricia Shaw
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melodie Ohaus
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
Laurie Diman / SUSAN ALIOTA
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Davies
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
W
Charmaine Gittens / Stephanie Stanton
2026-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Kline
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Krista Renken / Jane Kirk
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Meyer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.