← Search

Katie O'Shea

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
135 matches · 95W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
64%
stay 3.5
36%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.5
74 of 176
NC · 3.5
137 of 293
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Katie is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Katie has gone from the 70th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 70.9% of games
3.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.1% of games
3.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 58.4% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.9% of games
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.2% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
W
Maria Santamaria
2026-07-27 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
L
Dana Zimmer / Kathleen Johnstone
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.061better than expected — took 67% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Julian Black / Allison Turner
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jen Dauska
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
L
Katie Eggers / Tricia Shaw
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Warlick
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kimberly Battle / Sarah Asby
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with SUSAN ALIOTA
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Patricia Stichnoth
2026-07-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Rhodes
+0.059better than expected — took 38% of games against 21% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Latha Baddigam / Karen Schneider
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Wagner
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Mindy Zimmerman / Susan Chandler
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Rhodes
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Mary Macuga / Josclyn Reed
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jen Dauska
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.