← Search

Jamie Zarambo

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 84W–98L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jamie Zarambo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-09-14 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Sofarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-05 · VKoskinas (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Haden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kym Armbruster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · KMassaro (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Dobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · ACutts (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-24 · KMassaro (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Smallwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · VKoskinas (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donnarae Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · VKoskinas (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with April Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · ACutts (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · VKoskinas (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Haden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kym Armbruster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · BHarrell/NLeCroy (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sunkul Soni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.8%
26W–19L · 55.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
24W–40L · 43.9% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.1% of games
6.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.5% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.3% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#1 Singles
23%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
32 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams