← Search

Joan Carney

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 70W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joan Carney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-08-26 · JCarney (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Bardin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · BDunn (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colette Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · JCarney (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kathryn Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trevor Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Menninger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Menninger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Clune
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · HMcClure/ASmith (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne McBrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · HMcClure/ASmith (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne McBrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Menninger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
68%
34W–16L · 60.4% of games
3.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 32.5% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.8% of games
6.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 24.7% of games
3.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova