← Search

Elaine Eisenbaum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MATTHEWS, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 60W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history135 matches
W
2026-09-02 · CArevalo (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peggy Reimann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · CArevalo (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate MacRone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · EEisenbaum (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Bumgarner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · EEisenbaum (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gus Sinibaldi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · EEisenbaum (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gus Sinibaldi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · CArevalo (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate MacRone
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · PReimann/KLucas (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Arevalo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · KMacrone (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Campbell
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-07 · PReimann/KLucas (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Occhipinti
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-06 · KMacrone (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Reimann
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-24 · PReimann/KLucas (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Morgan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-19 · CArevalo (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Arevalo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
54.2%
32W–27L · 51.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.8% of games
6.5
36%
9W–16L · 44.1% of games
3.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 42% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert