← Search

Silvy Kehrli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 165W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history205 matches
L
2026-10-19 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-08 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Kehrli-Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Scott
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victoria Ellington
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-01 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Welborn
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-24 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi May
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Welborn
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Pfenning
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-08 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Scott
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-15 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Scott
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
93.7%
59W–4L · 65.8% of games
4.25
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.8% of games
4.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 48.6% of games
7.5
95.8%
23W–1L · 69.9% of games
8.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 64% of games
7.0mixed
92%
23W–2L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova