← Search

Jackie Scott

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 106W–55L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history161 matches
W
2026-09-30 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Welborn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Kehrli-Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Welborn
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Kehrli-Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Earhart
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · Kehrli-Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Silvy Kehrli
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Kehrli-Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Files
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Silvy Kehrli
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-19 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Earhart
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-01 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Silvy Kehrli
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-12 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-10 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.75
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 89.6% of games
3.25
100%
7W–0L · 76.8% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 72.4% of games
3.75
100%
5W–0L · 63.3% of games
4.0
81.2%
26W–6L · 67.2% of games
4.5
43.6%
17W–22L · 49.4% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.9% of games
8.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
19%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams