← Search

Elizabeth Scott

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 105W–82L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mimi Luong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evelyn Maurras
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jamie Juergens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-14 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bianca Femia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harrison Heien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gracie Gentry
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Arens/Bentonville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob Holt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
3.25
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
3.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 57.2% of games
4.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 44.8% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 44.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.1% of games
7.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 45.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe