← Search

Jamie Juergens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 176W–75L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history251 matches
W
2026-10-03 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Casey Tauber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ellen Lundy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Casey Tauber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Debby Blackburn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariko Paschall
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Murphy
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allyn Elleman
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Casey Tauber
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Casey Tauber
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Ho
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-15 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Casey Tauber
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 74.9% of games
3.25
100%
5W–0L · 78.2% of games
3.5
96.6%
28W–1L · 72.4% of games
3.75
70%
7W–3L · 56.2% of games
4.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 57.5% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 41.4% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games
7.5
76.5%
26W–8L · 56.9% of games
8.5
35%
7W–13L · 46.9% of games
4.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
48 matches
#1 Singles
10%
25 matches
Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams