← Search

Debby Blackburn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmington, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 126W–130L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history256 matches
W
2026-09-20 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mariko Paschall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-17 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Young
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-13 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Armstrong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jamie Juergens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Shearman
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misty Compton
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Boen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Tauber
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · Shearman/Springdale/FAC · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · Shearman/Springdale/FAC · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Shearman/Springdale/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Tauber championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela Cordero championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.75
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.2% of games
4.0
54.9%
62W–51L · 53.4% of games
4.25
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.1% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
47.2%
25W–28L · 48.1% of games
8.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 38.5% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
54 matches
Singles
9%
23 matches
#1 Singles
9%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams