← Search

Rebecca Cantey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lowell, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 144W–123L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history267 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Gore-Miller-Young/Bella Vista/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie DeFalco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-10-06 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Whatley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-29 · Gore-Miller-Young/Bella Vista/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jodee Gore-Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Cantey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Cantey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Cantey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginger Butcher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · Gore-Miller-Young/Bella Vista/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie DeFalco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-3
L
2026-09-17 · Gore-Miller-Young/Bella Vista/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie DeFalco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Allen championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Allen championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-1
W
2026-09-08 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Whatley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.25
100%
6W–0L · 66.4% of games
3.5
60%
69W–46L · 52.8% of games
3.75
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 45.5% of games
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.4% of games
7.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 56% of games
3.5mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 50.3% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
85 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer