← Search

Susan Barkley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bentonville, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 142W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history224 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shangwen Huang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Williams/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brenda Jeter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · Williams/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen HIckman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Williams/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nan Ginger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-28 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robbie Rutherford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gabriela Bottger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Barkley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Barkley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-09 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Barkley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Barkley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Barkley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.6%
68W–27L · 60.4% of games
3.75
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 47.7% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.7%
30W–22L · 51.6% of games
4.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
49 matches
#1 Singles
12%
26 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe