← Search

Karen HIckman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
275 matches · 121W–154L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history275 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellie Esry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · Williams/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Gieringer Mcwha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-01 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellie Esry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-30 · Williams/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Barkley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Edmiaston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Stafford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Maher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-29 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Akins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martin Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Odulia Sites
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martin Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 56.6% of games
3.25
50%
9W–9L · 46.8% of games
3.5
43.3%
42W–55L · 48.6% of games
4.0
12.5%
4W–28L · 33.6% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.3% of games
7.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 44% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
59%
23W–16L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
100 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer