← Search

Clay Fecht

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 49W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Talia McGowan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Cicatiello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Zana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Zana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Zana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Default
2026-05-05 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicolas Kehoe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-04-23 · Fecht-White/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Guanghao Lin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-20 · Ellington/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Hinkebein
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Fecht-White/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jarrod Anderson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · Ellington/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Hultquist
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-16 · Fecht-White/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Guanghao Lin
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Hoehner
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
57.8%
26W–19L · 52.8% of games
3.25
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.4% of games
3.5
14.6%
7W–41L · 35.9% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
23%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams