← Search

John Gottbrath

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 53W–119L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history172 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stafford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stafford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stafford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shaun Stacey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-10 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Sperry
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Hubbard
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Stacey
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-18 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Stacey
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-5
L
2026-03-11 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shaun Stacey
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with SANDEEP KANAMALA
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-24 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shaun Stacey
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.6% of games
3.5
32.8%
19W–39L · 43.6% of games
4.0
5.6%
2W–34L · 34.1% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.3% of games
7.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 35.9% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer