← Search

Talia McGowan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 77W–60L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history137 matches
L
2026-10-17 · Cicatiello-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-01 · Cicatiello-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Darcy Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-29 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolina Mejia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shangwen Huang
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbi Nelson
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Fecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Vargo championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Neal championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Vargo championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.75
80%
4W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.0
80%
16W–4L · 68.7% of games
3.5
56.5%
26W–20L · 51% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.5% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.9% of games
6.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.1% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 48% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#1 Singles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams