← Search

Abbi Nelson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 163W–146L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history309 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Lankford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Velotta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-07 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracey Kenny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-24 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristine Warner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-02 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracey Kenny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Allard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-27 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Maxwell
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-24 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Talia McGowan
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Greer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Britton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Greer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Maxwell
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.3% of games
2.75
100%
8W–0L · 67.4% of games
3.0
84.4%
27W–5L · 63.7% of games
3.25
100%
5W–0L · 72.8% of games
3.5
49%
51W–53L · 51.7% of games
3.75
75%
3W–1L · 55.6% of games
4.0
17.8%
8W–37L · 35.9% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.7% of games
6.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 61.6% of games
7.5
32%
8W–17L · 42.2% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 53.3% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
68 matches
#1 Singles
16%
49 matches
#2 Singles
9%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova