← Search

Leeanna Rogers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elm Springs, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 53W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Salmon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-14 · Harris/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Senlikci
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-07 · Harris/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Gilbert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Sandlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Madigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Tauber
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela Cordero
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-24 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela Cordero
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · Bell/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Brooks
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Boen-Womack/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Sandlin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · Boen-Womack/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Ostrander
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · Bell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Sandlin
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.75
75%
6W–2L · 51.8% of games
4.0
71.7%
38W–15L · 58.1% of games
4.25
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 33% of games
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 49.6% of games
8.5
0%
0W–21L · 30.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert