← Search

Allison van Matre

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 145W–73L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history218 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-30 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rebecca Callaway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-26 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Saffran mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Saffran mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-16 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Welborn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hayes Shimp mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-22 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Saffran mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Purkey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hayes Shimp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-4
W
2026-07-25 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shailyn Abbott championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.7% of games
4.0
92%
23W–2L · 70.8% of games
4.25
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.5% of games
4.5
72.3%
47W–18L · 57.4% of games
7.5
100%
10W–0L · 76.6% of games
8.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 59.2% of games
4.5mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
57 matches
Singles
10%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer