← Search

Will Aguilar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
304 matches · 199W–105L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history304 matches
L
2026-10-19 · McVinney/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vijay Patel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Sykes championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Sykes championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Sykes championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Aguilar/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Spencer Mathews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-1
L
2026-10-06 · McVinney/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vijay Patel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-01 · McVinney/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matt Dinehart
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Landis/Shaver/LR/Rebsamen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gerald New
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-21 · Aguilar/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Johnnie Ross
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-17 · Aguilar/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martin DeHaven
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-15 · Landis/Shaver/LR/Rebsamen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Valentin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · AR 4.5-3.5M 40 & Over (Mesaris) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Wilson
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.3% of games
3.25
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.5
76.2%
32W–10L · 61% of games
4.0
57.8%
52W–38L · 54.3% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
6.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.2% of games
7.5
75%
21W–7L · 62.6% of games
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.2% of games
4.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 55.2% of games
4.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 35% of games
6.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 69.9% of games
7.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
112 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
73 matches
Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova