← Search

Laura Sandlin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 94W–65L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history159 matches
L
2026-10-03 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leeanna Rogers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margaret Schloss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Salmon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Womack
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Compton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misty Compton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Tarnasky
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Boen
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Ready
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Womack
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
Default
2026-05-09 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Womack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-29 · Bell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Womack
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.4%
54W–14L · 62.6% of games
4.25
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.2% of games
4.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.1% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59% of games
8.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe