← Search

Maria Blunden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lowell, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 126W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history186 matches
L
2026-05-16 · Russell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Daniels championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · Russell/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Allard championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · Russell/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Hoffmann championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Daniels
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-29 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Grace Stich
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-27 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Coppick
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-04-26 · Hoffmann/Lowell/MRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Daniels
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-04 · Russell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Daniels
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
75.2%
94W–31L · 60.9% of games
4.25
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.1% of games
4.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.9% of games
7.5
80%
12W–3L · 57.9% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#2 Singles
12%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer