← Search

Colleen Daniels

— year-end
31 matches · 16W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Colleen Daniels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-07-11 · Elliott-Berger/Rogers/PCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leann Akers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Berger-Overton/Rogers/PCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Elliott-Berger/Rogers/PCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Ocarroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · Berger-Overton/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Blunden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-29 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Ferrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-27 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Aguilar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-26 · Hoffmann/Lowell/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Hoffmann/Lowell/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pleshette Benford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Blunden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · Russell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Blunden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-02 · Hoffmann/Lowell/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sommer Colaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 53% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams