← Search

Natalie Gorman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 110W–63L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-10-05 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Lundy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-23 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ophelia Chen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-20 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sommer Colaco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Wetzel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Wetzel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Smith mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Smith mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kleinebreil
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Kleinebreil
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Javier Cordero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hartle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 55.3% of games
2.75
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 58% of games
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 56.1% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 32.6% of games
5.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 48% of games
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 61.7% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
2.5mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 59% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#1 Singles
10%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King