← Search

Faith Hendricks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 120W–154L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history274 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Buffy Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cassie Booth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-14 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Avie Sassan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-12 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Fenton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-11 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cassie Booth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-08 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cassie Booth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-07 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eve LeMaster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-01 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Bryant
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Short mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-23 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Fenton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-15 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Buffy Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.6% of games
2.75
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
53.7%
29W–25L · 50.7% of games
3.25
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games
3.5
36.2%
21W–37L · 43.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0%
0W–6L · 35.9% of games
6.5
53.7%
22W–19L · 51.8% of games
7.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 35.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 54.1% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
70 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova