← Search

Buffy Carter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
457 matches · 231W–226L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history457 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Faith Hendricks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Hufford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-07 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-06 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Avie Sassan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-05 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Fenton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Taake mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-23 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hattie Kurin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joellen Joy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-15 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Faith Hendricks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeanie Shade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 60.2% of games
3.25
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.7% of games
3.5
54%
68W–58L · 48.8% of games
3.75
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
4.0
15.2%
7W–39L · 35.6% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.4%
31W–25L · 52.7% of games
7.5
34.9%
15W–28L · 46.2% of games
3.5mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 53% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–13L · 38.4% of games
6.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
159 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
104 matches
#1 Singles
6%
27 matches
#2 Singles
5%
23 matches
Singles
5%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer