← Search

Gretchen Pharis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 64W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-10-05 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Killingsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-14 · Schutz-Bertram/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tami Chrisman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · Schutz-Bertram/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Killingsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Short
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Mayer
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hierholzer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-05-07 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-06 · Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Heinzelmann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-28 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Alpe
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MJ Schutz
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 65.9% of games
2.75
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
3.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 58.1% of games
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.8% of games
5.5
75%
12W–4L · 58.9% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.1% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal