← Search

MJ Schutz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
262 matches · 162W–100L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history262 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tia Greaser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-29 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Becca Bertram
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Myra Dallas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-09 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Gammill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Killingsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Gammill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Mayer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Mayer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Sahu
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Mayer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myra Dallas
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Pharis
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.25
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
2.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.7% of games
2.75
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.5% of games
3.0
66.3%
55W–28L · 57.5% of games
3.25
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 50.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 52.9% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
3.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.6% of games
6.0mixed
74.2%
23W–8L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
62 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert