← Search

Victoria Gammill

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 77W–90L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history167 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MJ Schutz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-03 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MJ Schutz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tia Greaser
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Moore-Chrisman/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carter Chrisman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Hendrix
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · Moore-Chrisman/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Chrisman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Killingsworth
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · Moore-Chrisman/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Herbert Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Moore
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-26 · Greaser-Larimer/Bentonville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becca Bertram
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.75
50%
6W–6L · 49.8% of games
3.0
50%
34W–34L · 49.3% of games
3.25
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.5% of games
5.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 53.8% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.6% of games
3.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.3% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#2 Singles
8%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova