← Search

Melanie Neal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 132W–83L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history215 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Montesi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-12 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Montesi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-11 · Letts/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Benefield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-05 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christy Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-23 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Fleming
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Fitzgerald
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · Letts/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Allard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-13 · Letts/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Benefield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · Letts/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Benefield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-03 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cally Turner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Montesi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Letts
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63% of games
2.75
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.5%
36W–19L · 59.4% of games
3.5
52.5%
32W–29L · 51.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 47.6% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
6.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.4% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 46% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games
3.5mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer