← Search

Andrea Boyle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 85W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history159 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Webb/Bentonville/PCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti McGill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-12 · Schaller-Boyle/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Ferguson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-06 · Schaller-Boyle/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leann Akers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-29 · Schaller-Boyle/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leann Akers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-28 · Webb/Bentonville/PCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dondi Sanders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-14 · Webb/Bentonville/PCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dondi Sanders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · Schaller-Boyle/Rogers/PCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Ferguson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Schaller-Boyle/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Libby Schaller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Elliott-Berger/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Elliott
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Elliott-Berger/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ocarroll
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · Elliott-Berger/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leann Akers
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-27 · Schaller/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leann Akers
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.5
59%
36W–25L · 54.4% of games
3.75
61.9%
13W–8L · 50.5% of games
4.0
28%
7W–18L · 45.4% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.3% of games
7.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 48.2% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams