← Search

Ginger Butcher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Centerton, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 119W–49L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history168 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/IND · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Rickard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-14 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/IND · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Antonietta Hunter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-11 · Bohnert/Rogers/IND · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lacey Mitchell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Bohnert/Rogers/IND · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracey Wren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elena Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/IND · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Antonietta Hunter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-21 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Cantey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Wewers championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Whatley championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Wewers championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Wewers championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elena Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 73.2% of games
3.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 69.1% of games
3.5
79.1%
34W–9L · 65.1% of games
4.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 53.7% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.6% of games
7.5
86.2%
25W–4L · 65.2% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams