← Search

Elena Olson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 127W–91L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history218 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Liipfert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginger Butcher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/IND · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Whatley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Britt Mcewen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Beere
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Rickard-Wewers/Centerton/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginger Butcher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Infante
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Beere
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Butcher- Infante/Centerton/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Allen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Allen-Wewers/Lowell/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Allen
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Butcher- Infante/Centerton/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Infante
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Butcher- Infante/Centerton/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Infante
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.6% of games
3.25
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.9% of games
3.5
59.5%
47W–32L · 55.6% of games
3.75
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.7% of games
4.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 38.8% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.3% of games
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.4% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.2% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
12%
27 matches
#2 Singles
11%
24 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer