← Search

Mimi Luong

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 149W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history214 matches
W
Default
2026-10-26 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with April Hultquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-20 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Short mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Short mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Taake mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Gentry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Buescher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-16 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.9% of games
2.75
80%
4W–1L · 61.4% of games
3.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 61% of games
3.25
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
79.4%
50W–13L · 61.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 45% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 69.1% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 76.9% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.4% of games
3.5mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.8% of games
4.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams