← Search

Katherine Ferrer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BENTONVILLE, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 108W–54L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history162 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janett Rivera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-10-05 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurel Schley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-23 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Russell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-16 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Roden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-15 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maya Kushmaul
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-09-14 · Barkley-Schley/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren DeLeon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Shelton championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Shelton championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-29 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sommer Colaco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-27 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maya Kushmaul
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Schley/Springdale/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Bright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Overton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56% of games
2.75
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.1%
20W–15L · 53.1% of games
3.5
69.7%
46W–20L · 57.7% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.1% of games
6.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.3% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.3% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#1 Singles
16%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams