← Search

Sommer Colaco

BENTONVILLE, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 21W–28L · seasons 2020–2023
Where Sommer sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Sommer is one of 1052 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sommer has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.0202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Sommer has gone from the 37th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 41% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Catherine Womack / Sarah Madigan
2023-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacqueline Gaebe
−0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Casey Tevonian / Silvy Kehrli
2023-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Saffran
−0.061below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Sharon Gunter / Leah Hoffmann
2023-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Earhart
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne McGee
−0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Blumenstein
−0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jamie Eng / Quynh Tran
2023-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Blumenstein
+0.066better than expected — took 46% of games against 24% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2023-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Blumenstein
+0.018better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Jennie Hong / Makenzie Kinloch - (DQ)*
2023-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia van Pelt
−0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Ann Imus / Marla Volpe
2023-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne McGee
−0.010below expectation — took 42% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2023-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ran Duan
−0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-01-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Zaske
−0.014below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tetyana Sych
+0.015about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.