← Search

Deanna Cicatiello

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 128W–128L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history256 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Darcy Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Kaufmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristine Warner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-30 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Velotta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-24 · Cicatiello-Cicatiello/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-03 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · Behnke/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Warner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Fecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Raymond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Behnke/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Warner
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Behnke/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Colucci
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Behnke/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Cicatiello
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 77.1% of games
2.75
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.2% of games
3.0
65.8%
52W–27L · 53.5% of games
3.25
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
35.5%
22W–40L · 42.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 47% of games
5.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.8% of games
6.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 50.9% of games
7.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.6% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
57 matches
#1 Singles
14%
35 matches
#2 Singles
9%
24 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King