← Search

Amber Gaskill

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 132W–176L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history308 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Akins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-12 · Young/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Kaderly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-09 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gayla Saegert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-04 · Young/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Odulia Sites
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-21 · Young/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Odulia Sites
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-20 · Blackburn/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-31 · Young/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Karr
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Droke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Edmiaston
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
60.6%
57W–37L · 54.4% of games
3.75
0%
0W–8L · 40.2% of games
4.0
13.8%
9W–56L · 35.7% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62% of games
7.5
50%
22W–22L · 48.9% of games
3.5mixed
36.1%
13W–23L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
51.2%
22W–21L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
68 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams